Whether the circuit court of appeals erred in the assessment of a two point enhancement against the appellant for obstruction of justice

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN THE ASSESSMENT OF A TWO POINT ENHANCEMENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT JABARR RUDOLPH FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE PURSUANT TO § 3C1.1 OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES? II. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY FAILING TO ALLOW A THREE POINT REDUCTION BY ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3E1.1 OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL. Ill. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED IN ITS CALCULATION OF THE DRUG WEIGHT BY FINDING THAT THE PETITIONER WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR COCAINE BASE “CRACK” LEADING TO AN ENHANCED SENTENCE?