No. 20-5361
Luis Torres-Marquez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-sentencing discretion gall-v-united-states judicial-discretion presumption-of-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentencing court meaningfully exercised its discretion in applying the guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW For purposes of applying the abuse of discretion standard and presumption of reasonableness on appellate review of a within guidelines sentence, does Gall v. United States' mandate reviewing courts to first determine whether the sentencing court meaningfully exercised its discretion in applying the guidelines, instead of mechanistically going through the process? ' Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007). iv
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Luis Torres-Marquez
Ezekiel E. Cortez — Law Offices of Ezekiel E. Cortez, Petitioner
Ezekiel E. Cortez — Law Offices of Ezekiel E. Cortez, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent