No. 20-5362
David Wayne Allen v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
IFP
Tags: biased-juror death-penalty due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus juror-bias ohio-supreme-court sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court's refusal to dismiss a biased juror from a Death Penalty Panel, deprive Petitioner Allen of protection under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and were subsequent findings of the Ohio Supreme Court contrary or an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the trial court’s refusal to dismiss a biased juror from a Death Penalty Panel, deprive Petitioner Allen of protection under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and were subsequent findings of the Ohio Supreme Court contrary or an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-20
Brief of respondent Betty Mitchell in opposition filed.
2020-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Betty Mitchell
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
David Allen
John Joseph Ricotta — John J. Ricotta, Petitioner
John Joseph Ricotta — John J. Ricotta, Petitioner