No. 20-5369
Don Farmer v. Bernard Booker, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause court-procedure crawford-vs-washington due-process evidence-testimonial ineffective-assistance legal-standards professional-norms sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence verbal-testimony witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence supplied through verbal testimony of a witness is considered testimonial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Whether the evidence supplied through verbal testimony of a witness is considered testimonial Where statements must be Sunctionally identical to tiwe in courk testimony.” ? 2.) Whether a complaint uncler Va. Cocle 3 18.2-6) ) that the Commonwealth avocated she Position that Williams was the rapist? 3.) Whether an attorneys vepresentation amounted to . a — . ” in competence under prevailing professional norms, not whether 1A deviated from vesk Practices or common custom? 2 4.) Does it veflect that there may Ve no Factfinding at all, at least Sor certain Wypes of claims ° .
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent Bernard Booker to respond filed.
2020-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Bernard Booker
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent