No. 20-5369

Don Farmer v. Bernard Booker, Warden

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause court-procedure crawford-vs-washington due-process evidence-testimonial ineffective-assistance legal-standards professional-norms sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence verbal-testimony witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the evidence supplied through verbal testimony of a witness is considered testimonial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Whether the evidence supplied through verbal testimony of a witness is considered testimonial Where statements must be Sunctionally identical to tiwe in courk testimony.” ? 2.) Whether a complaint uncler Va. Cocle 3 18.2-6) ) that the Commonwealth avocated she Position that Williams was the rapist? 3.) Whether an attorneys vepresentation amounted to . a — . ” in competence under prevailing professional norms, not whether 1A deviated from vesk Practices or common custom? 2 4.) Does it veflect that there may Ve no Factfinding at all, at least Sor certain Wypes of claims ° .

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent Bernard Booker to respond filed.
2020-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Bernard Booker
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Don Farmer
Don Farmer — Petitioner
Don Farmer — Petitioner