Whether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in denying post-conviction relief despite the prisoner's claims that his trial counsel was ineffective, that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury, and that the prisoner was deprived of certain constitutional rights

No question identified. : oo Q wections Prusentid a Wie idichinant could at te Omendid fallsuring guilty wndict . ded ik inn ny 3 coy il Yad itn Aenea Ofaseatd Buch) gilda Code dn 2 17-17-98 } ; Roy “tate uid % uit, bexencl eS a i 3g Bimaoe smabilaiad Hat the wosiaus sas thet Yo rained aurced the Wes Dguar Krwe,tiome Cae af free Code Anan. 8 9-345) 2620) the Micriaeppir Kuprome Coudk Now pruviour dabnourlidys that oe fe ak d He rights ts o Leg ade, y arate More ane’ |) te lena, aw Jvkorwen | Gidamanil ged a ig nd jn a © Citid frome procured tasn of he Unifaron Pok-Cane | in a Assis at citenm, & Cauced a. differant rol im ravkinds? 3) Corse in wrtuch — | the prisonet claims Ka smitines Yas ayaiced tad ke Beow Awitines, purrsuait 16 Mia. Cede Ann. F-N-81-19-372306), Rradlig v bats, 11 Si.2d 1662 CMting, Chr. Ayo, 2005), 4800 tacad on, : 6. eee mit la deprived of cect naa hil sonable aduanes oars Cons, fon 5 I. T PoskGonviation prociidai yo ringing to (owt attention habe af ied (4 . ’ . Ver 626 Se. 2d i fro Aleman 993)» ‘Ou ad, 584 So. 24-736 Cin, (990), } Mos. Cade Arn.2 17-17-3309 Mise Ravin agar, nailoncs tric Wah logan 00 Gppiactd 20 the pale fae sigh suck ple oe in auilincing Odin im pacttanoation preceding. Cade 1972,88 1-37 19-17-83: Sup , Rule 60)U.S.0.A. Alast. 5, 6, H 1. Fin pean conw at Yun, the opend 4 pedtuned an. In Asatin. W-M°8 I, tht The maninaon prnalty under ls, Cade Ann 8 17(1-33. saes i Pak eever-apara, the Triad cows 19-14-31 #0 9-88 as on Lenpa gen Omaudnnte te Aa aval Canaion of Keinage Ox 0 rocidine, and dott fendiline Utatly mati Wine sha lal wae only asking Atwon~ ree Be wae Wana fly aor sowed Vand Cibo FAB far Sife wd Rarale, . of 1972, $8 ITT 81, TA-€3; Lap, Ob Rules, 6b), USC. Ay Canak, Amend. 5, 6, /40. Eaew Patttionor're mat ontitled, 20 fave a yy B ee path aes te la han te be of lw sh . ode reson dd alt the alma rpin eh ; I em Moe. Code Ann. £99-11683 (14 . BY. UL Punewand Jo Mise Cede Arun 2 9-l4-83 puuids thal ani re geal Airbdneced Te akd nvwed noparite towns foes ee gt re eae Lie: fk pil Abel Rasa bn oot aoc b sheds a wl ve Aunpindad aAdll auch purser te whale " Stina eh of Mie. ates. . 4-83 C1984) de that the (Ritinage) shell Rave .e . ot Leak ona pen Lach vavrlinds . svat 12, et indicat satan th Pandora or SS day of Asay 1984, curs Caunee. $40, wrhuwas . Ya laine Ghat ne LN Ai Ins CURIA NOW N-587 and 55 conncionts sialotid ig Right off ie ede 4 iK fierdamatal, } git ut thet ww Cath tatty Cele) Bobo kla 18 $0.24 1032 (20/2) C42 S9.3d 503.0508, Roland, 1359.2 634-35, 1636-37 of 038 . ~jy| 1 ha briel cout artes uthon A drclaced thet the that courtitiche enw Bo tule procktidaineg ruc. Lue packianyiztlon fg include # CD Caoase-“uirumich ng dhcsiane Of the Misaipp Ot Uniti Sales Lomrame Coote which tld adverts offack the cutbeuns of idovrier, Mot dinceunralle at Bulal Hat wold Ae : ceuacd a, dipppinedt walt: in amitinesing . art C2) Case din Wawa. Corda Arn, 819-0928 (0, Rradley v. Rotate, 19S, 24 (062 Cras, Us, App. 2005), (4. Kikea double j clase, 0. ain, Of) LMagal 2am — fina Sd of dad pas wnt alo ‘ regard lit Uhr, K ta reaivad * icp at Cu GRAD the SBIC in untiouf * ns +45 , ti bf jth dae thins US A, Cont Amende. C 4 Wasts A.M.C. 219-397-210), —-VV Sa taba en Le, widens vhs ny 77, 89-19-83; Conk, £43 822. (Tina gts ieee All paitito appuaie nw the ception Of The Case Ov the Coren | i | | —Vii Walle Acctharntite | ix~xi Gian Relou 7 | latinas 5-8 | Comeluaiar 1-18 , Appimdun A whoo Phe Bespecnt Ceuct Of iain | Appendia B deal and Prisnity Wail Recap | = Vi , Agpondits E duditmord im Cassoe 10.390 | ond Schepf Tio additiends abet whoo, iG prod of oth of me —-i Ko | Akina v, Kati, 193 So.2d 132/ ot 1322 Maa. 1986) 13, Rottony, ae 4 Breonwilla, 253 Tina, 656, 666, ‘ , 173 %0.2d 66% 672 (1%64) | Is Brocka y, Saty, 207 (ise. 159, 16 90.24 4950) 9 Rocke v. United Satie, 137 US.1,988.06, 2/4) 57 | L.Ed. 2d ¢ C1975) 2, Clouse v, Katy, 522 So. 2d 762 (nian. 1998) 4 Covtrorae v. 145 So.2d 543,595 n