Does the failure of the Third Circuit and other courts to consider the Plaintiff's substantive due process claims applied to the prohibition of cannabis constitute a violation of the Plaintiff's due process rights?

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does the failure of the Third Circuit and other courts to consider the Plaintiff's substantive due process claims applied to the prohibition of cannabis constitute a violation of the Plaintiff's due process rights. (Suggested Answer: Yes the Plaintiff a law student who intentionally had themselves caught with a bit of marijuana so they could challenge the constitutionality of the prohibition of cannabis under the theory of substantive due process has instead had the federal judges issues opinions about ‘class of one’ and ‘equal protection’ theory but not ‘substantive due process’. If they would Petitioner would win but instead they mis represent and miscategorize the arguments of the Petitioner pick a few of the weaker points they can find and represent this to be the totality of the Plaintiff's arguments) Petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the Third Circuit to decide on the merits of the Plaintiffs claim e Substantive Due Process Applied To Cannabis Prohibition o As it impacts minorities unequally o As the representation of it as with no medicinal value is false and made with such a reckless degree of falsity given current knowledge that the representation of such is tantamount to fraud which is a due process violation in and of itself o The medicinal necessity and use of the cannabis that has been widely recognized and accepted since the past. ‘ Instead of e Class of one theory e Equal protection theory e Whatever other theory considered that is not the above pled claim. And the it makes it look as if the Petitioner is the one who hoes’ know the law.. The von paints of courts have spent as much as 5 years circling around this central argument of the Plaintiff instead of answering it directly to which the Plaintiff files the : instant petition for writ of mandamus. Surely this is an injustice. (2) Does the Third Circuit Opinion dated 7/31/2020 in case 19-1106 in any wayanswer _ the Petitioner's substantive due process claims in their Supplemental Brief? (Factual Answer: Absolutely Not.) i