No. 20-5381

Lawrence F. Curtin v. Kimberly Cortez

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: eighth-amendment fifth-amendment first-amendment florida fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment judicial-qualification-commission petition redress-of-grievances sixth-amendment state-court-judge
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

First Amendment right to petition Florida's Judicial Qualification Commission, the government, in writing, for a redress of grievances about state court judge Janet Croom

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DO | HAVE A FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PETINMON FLORIDA'S JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION . COMMISSION, THE GOVERNMENT, IN WRITING, FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES ABOUT STATE COURT JUDGE JANET CROOM? . : _. DOLHAVE A FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SPEAK TO THE PRESS WHEN CORTEZ FORBIDES ME TO SPEAK TO THE PRESS AND BLOCKS MY ATTEMPTS TO SPEAK TO THE GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA AND OTHERS? : | : DO | HAVE A FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM UNREASONABLE SEIZURES AND SEARCHES WHERE THE APFERMATION BY KIMBERLY CORTEZ THE STATE ATTORNEY tS FALSE | AND THERE [S NO CRIME COMMITTED BY IMIE? AIL OTHER ACTS BY THE STATE ATTORNEY THAT FOLLOWED WERE WITHOUT FOUNDATION. a DOU HAVE A FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDING IN A CRIMINALCASE NOTTO BE FORCED TO BE A WITNESS AGAINGT IMVSELF? ; DO | HAVE A SDH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL WHIEN | HAVE MADE A TIMELY ; REQUEST IN WRITING AND A REQUEST TO REPRESENT MYSELF? ; DO} HAVE AN EIGHTH AMENDMENT RIGHT NOT TO HAVE EXCESSIVE BAIL THAT GOES BEYOND WHAT IS NORMAL ANID WHERE THERE IS NO CRIME? DO | HAVE A FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW WHEN CORTEZ DEPRIVES ME OF UIBERTY AND OTHER RIGHTS WITHOUT FAIR DUEPROCESSOF . —~ LAW AND THERE IS NO CRIME COMMITTED BY ME? CORTEZ’S ACTIONS HAVE NULIFED AND MADE VOID AND IMPAIRED MY PRIVILEGES ANID IIMIMUNITES. DOES CORTEZ HAVE THIS RIGHT? . CAN I BRING A COMPLAINT AGAINST CORTEZ FOR FRAUDLENTLY ENDORSEING A MOTION FOR "EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT WHEN THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS THAT WERE REQUIRED BY STATE LAW TO BRING SUCH AN ACTION? FLORIDA LAW RULE 3.210. DOES THE HONEST SERVICES FRAUD ACT 18 USC 1346 PROTECT IME FROM FRAUD PERFORMED MULTIPLE TIMES BY CORTEZ IN HER ROLE AS STATE ATTORNEY? DO I HAVE THE SAME RIGHT AS OTHERS TO HAVE THE DISTRICT COURT EXAMINE THE HEART OF MY COMPLAINT WHICH IS LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE, INSTEAD DENY MY APLICATION ON ERRONEOUS GROUNDS? MY FACTS WHICH, IF PROVEN MIGHT ARGUABLY ENTITLE ME TO RELIF? : OG | HAVE A RIGHT IN FILING A CLAIM IN DISTRICT COURT AGAINST KIMBERLY CORTEZ TO HAVE A SUMMONS ISSUED WHEN f HAVE FILED IN DISTRICT COURT AND THE 117 CIRCUIT OF APPEALS ON THEIR FORMS COMPLETE AND ACOURATE FINANCIALS ANID ALL FLORIDA STATE COURTS AND FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE KENINITH MARRA HAVE ACCEPTED MY VERY SAME FINANCIALS? : DESPITE MY HAVING DONE EVERY THING BY THIE LETTER OF THE LAW SHOULD I HAVE MY IUIFE, HEALTH, WORK DESTROYED BY STATE ACTORS’ FRAUD?

Docket Entries

2020-12-17
Case considered closed.
2020-10-13
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 3, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent Kimberly Cortez to respond filed.
2020-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Kimberly Cortez
Kimberly CortezState Attorney's Office-19th Judicial Circuit, State of Florida, Respondent
Kimberly CortezState Attorney's Office-19th Judicial Circuit, State of Florida, Respondent
Lawrence F. Curtin Curtin
Lawrence F. Curtin — Petitioner
Lawrence F. Curtin — Petitioner