No. 20-5382

William Charles Graham v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitution constitutional-rights due-process federal-system government-discretion judicial-independence legal-safeguards standing
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Constitution of the United States of America, its Articles, and its Amendments are the Supreme Law of the land?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1. 15 the Gonstitution of the United Shites ef America, its Avheles, and ts Aiendinents the Supreme. Law of tha land 7 | 2. \s slavery abolished in its legal form 2 3. fs Fighting fy whet 1s mine , a onme 2 4. De my Conshwional Rights denve fram a buna being aAiscreh on ? 5. — [an the Government and/or its subordinates violate iny Rights at their discretion without Due. Process without any divect consequences 2 b. Dees the Federal sysiem have proven independence ? 7, des thy Eighth Circuit and its dishict courts Supereede, the Consitwhon of the United Yates of —— Ainenea a . 8, How dees an Acct \nited Stiles Mtoe (who ty Violation of Avdicle 1, Seed, old ‘Tite of Nobility who represents the Government vHer an Unlawful circumvented deRohve Indictment and pot face. any direct consequences a 4, Is FeauD due, Process 7 \0. According to the Constitution (a noble document) and the Amertan Bar Associaton » are Jodges (tual juggs) charged with “ Safeguarding the, fights of the accused Men| Women ? " M, Being tho indichnent’ of the fedow| system is oquivaleny t Yo Stakes Version of the Fourth Amendment Warrant, do Signatves ot the ForePeRson and \).S Morne Name need to be visible and signed Under penal hy or perry for Such dowmemt do pave vabidity 7 i2. (an chief deputy clerks \ésue a Properly clrawn Forth Ainendmery Wanany under oath or affirmatian Siem who and what Rie +> be sgaiched ov seized 2 3, an an ATE nog witout ANY lawful docuipensption (o 4. Watrawt, Writ oF Habeas (orp) apprehend , 4 Mon |\womon fom proven iynsdichon (State) fo ome withart proven indegenderce. (Fedei and be, LAWFUL 2 OW, As on jaticle Ith Cow, the highest lout iqeewvenes 57, 4s mover and Cease the oppression and Malicyovs Conver Ya One hag endured over Si» lost Hiteen (15) months qi Heeide wie hack ty sociehy

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2020)

Attorneys

United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
William Charles Graham
William Charles Graham — Petitioner