Did the state district court failure to certify its grant of motion for reconsideration affect the course of proceedings and factor into the Nevada Supreme Court affirmance of the post-conviction writ prior to the scheduled evidentiary hearing, violate procedural-due-process,equal-protection,5th-amendment,14th-amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the state district court failure to certify its grant of motion for reconsideration affect the course of proceedings and factor into the Nevada Supreme Court affirmance of the post-conviction writ prior to the ; scheduled evidentiary hearing, violate "procedural due process and equal protection of law", as guaranteed by the 5th and 14th Amendments of the USS. Constitution? 2. Are federal habeas corpus determinations | . predicated upon a procedural error in state postconviction proceedings regarding other state court . judgments invalidated, where the "highly deferential standard of evaluation which demands that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt", preclude the standard of habeas corpus review within the . meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254? i’ ; i