No. 20-5392
Jermaine Tyrone Jones v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: completed-misdemeanor criminal-procedure fourth-amendment investigatory-stop misdemeanor reasonable-suspicion vehicle-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is reasonable suspicion of a completed misdemeanor sufficient under the Fourth Amendment to justify an investigatory stop of a vehicle when there is no evidence that any occupant of the vehicle was then committing or was about to commit a crime
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985), the Court held that an investigative stop can be based on reasonable suspicion of a completed felony. This case presents the question: Is reasonable suspicion of a completed misdemeanor sufficient under the Fourth Amendment to justify an investigatory stop of a vehicle when there is no evidence that any occupant of the vehicle was then committing or was about to commit a crime. i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-08-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Jermaine Tyrone Jones
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent