Does the Sentencing court have jurisdiction to sentence a defendant under a statute void or judgment unenforceable under the Constitution?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L. Does the Sentencing court have Tucisdictionto Sentence a defen dant404 Statute void 2 judgment un-ertorcecble undar the Constitution? 2. Does the Petitioner loa hi th ight to Ly on Asgaver; thot the eharging : Sen Fon cing se pisthec right void af Judgment? o 3. Can the Petitioner's right to relief fram an uaseanstitutiona | Sentence be time-barred by We State? 4. Does & Detendaut loose,or tortit hislher right +o the die Process of He . fenstiiption based upon the enforcement af a PublizRet enforced. by Phe. Law er Dur f: . 5, Lan a betitisner be dis erim ancwtly senteneed fo a sentencing sh fate fa which other criminal defendant bre removed trom, as b 212g th-eonsti~ tational, and void legislatwe,; Tudicial entorcement 7 b. Does a Petitisner loose histher right to challenge 2 criminal cenviction ot sentence, upon liter diseaver Ot Ei Kea | parton, Evidence vials tan s, commit ted by the State, in viola tin of the Constitational right of the Leten dant : 7. Oves a belitisner loose his her right to challenge a eriminal eenuiction, loker aiscovetd to be un-tanstitutional by the JS Upreme Court? 3. Does the Sentencing Court, ar the Court of Appeals, have the authe rity; Bhd wor, the Turisdicton do enforce a lad, en Mamie by the 4 Supreme Court; and the United Gtefes Constitabion 2. % Lon the Conetrtat inal fight te due Prucess fora Criminal detendant be electively foreFited, or temoved, when a Defendant had tiled an InLffective Assistance of Counsil Claim? 9 Poople uv, £020. ND. M4-CE-450 (2010), . Llreuif Lawrt xf the Sith Fvdicial Chreuit Court, Champaiga, Z L, Sudo ment April 4, 201b. ‘ People v. Reedy, No.295 LL App. 3d. Til App. Cireutt Court Ae Jndicial Lireuit Court, WaukKegay (TL. Judgment (7743) —* Thompkins v. Phicter, 48 Fi 3d 97, 983 L7 Cir. 2012) Faretta Vv California, 422 US, 406,834 C1975) 4 United States ve Gonzalez Lopez, S48 US. On, 4 (2000) "Thi, gvoting Vasqueg v, Hilleny, 74 US.254,203 (148). > Brady v. U.5.7397 WS. 442, 750 L470). mene . | ,