Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals erred in affirming the U.S. District Court's abstention from ruling on Sundy's independent claims despite Sundy being enjoined by a state court order from asserting those claims in state court, and the imposition of subjective and arbitrary requirements on Sundy to qualify to file papers and obtain a complete court record in both state and federal court

QUESTION PRESENTED 1, When the 11 Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the U.S. District Court’s abstaining from ruling on Sundy's independent claims despite Sundy being . clearly enjoined by order of the State trial court from asserting his independent claims in the State proceeding, and with pro se Sundy required to meet subjective and arbitrary requirements to qualify in both State and Federal court to file papers with the clerk and to obtain a complete court record, did the 11 Circuit establish that the liberty of Sundy can be restrained by the State of Georgia irrespective of — Constitutional protections, while denying Sundy recourse to a federal forum as well as adequate remedy? 2. Whether the State of Georgia can put United States citizens in custody when Congress and/or the U.S. Constitution has afforded all United States citizens the * unconditional right to equal protection to be secured in their papers, including the right to have a complete record in a court proceeding regardless of whether a citizen has any case pending before an appellate court or any right to appeal? \ i a ; A list of all