Did the Arizona Supreme court err by denying Father Fesigh English TIL's Petition for Review and request for a stay of proceedings, despite the fact that parallel civil (federal district court) proceedings could substantially prejudice English TIL's rights in his still pending capital criminal case, pursuant to federal case law and the Arizona's own case law?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ( Four Tota ) . [i] Did the Arizona Sepreme court err by Praying Father Fesigh Enplish TIL Petition for Revie” . and— Request Fer A Jtay of frocerhing sj, Aisregard of The Pact that pring parallel civir/ xe veni |e Court) : Precendings cold Substantially Prejy dice” Fasia}y ; . Englisn TIE * rigatS in bis Still ponding capital criminal case; purfoact to Federal Case law and Wen 4A rie own Arizona, cqse law? (Please see