No. 20-5415

Gillman Roddy Long, aka Dave Gillman Long v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment appeal-review civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence fifth-amendment habeas-corpus self-incrimination sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an objection to the government's argument that a defendant 'had not denied the accusations against him' violate the Fifth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented |. Does an obgecton to the gavecaments acguement that a defendant, “had not denied the accusations against him, violate the Fifth Amendinent ? 7 2. Does We Lower Cowct ertor, When + drsmessed Pelllioner’s -C.0.A. of a troe bO(d)M, Votdsudgement thet 5 A). Raised a defect in the integrity of the habeas Proceedings, and 8). Seeked the Court of apeeals to examine whether the | Aistrvct Couct Committed ercor when it adgzudi cated Pebhoner's LiF h-Amendment Claim by imerd pet ly applying Sixth amendment Guteria 2? 3. Does an ebgection at tral preserve a Claim of ecror for appeal review? . \ Parties to the Pro ceedings Pro-Se pebtoner, Glman Roady long Gnd Mhe United States af America, Respondant, af the only two Pacties trom the Proceed. ngs 10 the uated Shates Court of appeals for Me eighth Gircurt. . r

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Gillman Long
Gillman Roddy Long — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent