Whether the retroactive erasure of felony convictions violates due process and the denial of a Certificate of Appealability reflects a breakdown in the COA review process and raises a pressing matter of national importance

No question identified. : —— L = sou Thes@nteD _ i Dasucen Resussoe's enhance Sentence based on 4 vetroactively erased felony violates Due. process of Lav, |_and the denial of a Ceatibicate of Ampearamiry (COA), i|_veflects A beakdoved in the COA vei Process And a : BiSes A pressing Matee of Nationa importance Does two Courk clisacreeing, uaggautt the issuance of iy a od Ee ts —— undoli | bugdlensome COA Shandaeel That contoaenes | this Court's Precedents, and is deeply acbitecy’) || and Dees the downgrading of apcioc Bfben sealencing tt nvaticlate the prior And wreeart vesemenicing under a nue. pencess_And He Eighth Arend ment? ~ { : ] ' | | “TaBLE_o€ CONTENTS __ |i Questios P@ecentren | Fern WAIT OF CERTIORAK| . we ee ee | OPBNONS “BELOW 2 lL zoe LON 0 LELEVANT PROVISIONS «2 wn ee ee ee ||_