Michael D. Dyer v. Aimee Smith, Warden, et al.
Securities
Whether a defendant can knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily enter a guilty plea when the prosecutor is allowed to engage in misconduct without hindrance or redirection by the defendant's counsel
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED fell fig, OR »T10W C cen ER Be Enter into Knowingly, jwhelligenwt 4, VOlawtaaly ? When tne Peosecu toe is ‘lbwed otthout de hind aeguenewt OR Redireckon by a Detrulants counsel? SEE Cully Pred Tease pHs pages ? Anel & Where Dudge inteeCeres ito counsels Redécechon Aoguemeyt, Nzgok thon asquemewt a Plea iN Vidlaion pf Rule (eljor Faden! RULES of UNZ@2m Supkiztoz court Rule 338 @), How. cad this be adfiamed AS 4&4 Know:ng t gad volunstperly ANd TATE gently Catered PIE of cul ¢ SEE Alsi dovdle Tetpily sentenes prg, 2. How caw Sudge be Allowed to Appoint Counsel from Sime cbhice of Pablit Dewteadees To REE Sent! Debendant Oye, whed'tne Oeeadumt has af eotally shown the Judge tant teee dh SNE kee geon Osan AMSG Dui el oy E c betes (ce, A . f (Ss Ey f To REPIACE Counsel with con €-cks ot iy tecest Peulbint Steucteral Eeroe ?’ ee, 3.How can Guilty Pied be Knot tes. When safes Prosecube is Howe % Theo) iN Extza I consequences 32. condi bons, duaing tyig Plee collogey anci tue Suedlge inteeupts iwexpeeienced counse! When he tales t coeeet His doaoe , But doeswt — CORRE Prosecube fo Mis SEEmIngly vindictiveNEss to al weRE severe sentence? 4, DoES this Sigw thet fe Tudlge vod me Prosecutor Had PREyrously cliscussed tue Sewtewce of 12-10-6.! andi7-(0-7 in Absence of Coumse! in yroletson ats. Re Yl Exparte Commadiceitiws 2 SEE PleA colloquy at Pres 2, Thou k Gall Wes: S. Does the defendant have n due pedcess Right fo cmpartin! Sudge 2 ok otneruys: ? G. How Cay Me uc lly Pleg he entered Knoasing ly nectodewbpesly da reéiigently nnd * wit mie aad efective aul coablict tree ‘counsel cuhew He. Peosécater is Allowed To GEwcepte , RECREPMtE, counte Feit, FamudulewHy duplicate court document: wt will to INguice tpt the peosecutons yi ndichive CONSEGiLeUCES, Find an Negonated Ph démnls and compton ARE Placed upon & DECEadnat thot rs Wo lovge; PRO ed cange| fo iwsgave that hes rghts pee wet vcoluted ice te wolf fw tue ben courtsel & ~2s fe mach (Dt aol HebEeAs cozpus Tieanisceipts Appentlex'G* at fing ( “Proc 10, * Throog 4 22, How cow A Paesecaler be Bllowedd To Lae, mrke Fendt. gicomenbe. of Ple# agreements Thsough Stefe Proketios officer? See Appentx"A' page 2061 alse finowN AS Resporeaifs Exhibit 6 poge HAB. Ex.©0%2SEE O16, 6Ag G~gBU.iSpéctet Conlifioné) o€ Probation op Suspend ec Séwtedce gt Roltom of Page How can — TWS bE Kiowiagiy aac iatelligewt aud yo gnvagily acl yt counsel ? when hepe atten {ne clase & Court Anlin SécRet without counsel pry Paesedt > 02 Hou CAN PRoSECutiz CocomSPRRE witn Awgthe’ Goosen men Agency 2 ek? an Re ceed Boveen ment cloccim Eats, or fo coomten tert Gorean ment dotameat ty OR td fe aei~Ginel decamenvt eR wetiw CONTECH cet | agree mewts og Plem Negotoetbus PS EE. Ropead ix "E“ Noid teh pege2 of 2, ge fit eee ty within costtarct Plea Agpee —mMeot pl (NE C of Certiticate vb Coy ase | he Ce Eetl Lowe thant pe bigeirty ; decided” in Delesiclaats Exvor ane) Rginet tne’ tee NE contrwck ? SEEU.S. ¥, Hameli,d32 Fedd OS 198 Cad cir, 2005) de US, V. Floyd 42 F.3d S13, S16 (3d Ciz, 2008) But SEE, CG U.S. V, New heat, SOY F.3d (90, ($5 bend Cit Cite 2007) (defendant did set Baerch plep AgReement by withdrawing nig ow) becrese agreement wrs fenlyg hots aste whetatcumsbince -§ would pezmit withdanunl aq Aan hg ous Plea Agacements fw expreted Against claotten), Does Michel D, Dyers case Meet tus Ambigudus Caiteen ? ’ ras TS The Dyza Plem Breach of comtract “ow tne Goveavment Peet? —,, wf ; Bye PIE of CASE 06-CR= 12 $4-¢ meee, Ewtered Knowiagig, iw telligewtly 4.78 THE a tate ant utu able vac ctvE Counsel whew Courses Kade tant the Po£fd 0 Poncticedl his Lrwiess and Pegime tactics fo Remoke his own Cowtretts cal bu} w4q PIEAS > AGtEe tne Suclye ane Counsel No lomgee iateaberel al Mter ta close of cvs! abo Couissels Sate(HTp NES (OTAmeqir II, AN HT p.tl, WES [Through 14, How Stns Aw” Lega cocteact Agreement 2 fow (S {ws g& Hiowiag , intelligent al voluntary Pize?> How coes-tas Pita ir DeCendnnt, vis igi My o