Whether the court erroneously denied the motion for court-appointed counsel and erroneously held that the complaint failed to set forth a short and plain statement of the claims

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1 USCACcase 20-7001) erroneously denied my motion for court appointed counsel, aledging case did not have merits despite chief judge Mc Mahon it had merits and transferred it to DC because of venue. 2 USCAQ(Gd par.,april 15 2020 judgment, erroneously holds” Appellant's complaint failed to set forth “a short and plain statement” of the claims showing ‘she is entitled to relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)”,indeed,] did enclose in original complaint the statement required(as stated on p.7 of brief) “4. Likewise,on pp.14 to.20 of my pro se complaint, [ stated “ V. ; SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS", Indeed,on pp. 14 to 20,parr.13 on,of my civil action in district court 19-3349,I had. enclosed a “short and plain statement of claims”(see