No. 20-5421
Doved Ben Downer v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: charging-document criminal-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy drug-possession due-process information-charging legal-sufficiency racketeering statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether simple possession under Fla. Stat. § 893.13(6)(a) is a legally permissible racketeering predicate incident under Fla. Stat. §§ 895.02(1)(a), 895.02(1)(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ . | 1, IS. SIMPLE POSSESSION UNDER FS. 893.136)(A). A LEGALLY . PERMISSIBLE RACKETEERING PREDICATE INCIDENT UNDER FS. § 895.02(1)(a), § 895.02(1)(b)? z 2. CAN.A DEFENDANT BE TRIED AND CONVICTED FOR AN OFFENSE THAT THE INFORMATION DOES NOT ALLOWS? | . 2 : oo
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-18
Waiver of right of respondents Mark S. Inch, et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Mark S. Inch, et al.
Pamela J. Koller — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Pamela J. Koller — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent