Whether the state court's decision was contrary to this Court's decision in Lafler v. Cooper and Chaidez v. United States, and whether the court's decision was contrary to clearly established federal law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED AState Court of last resort decided an-important question of law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this court. This court decided Lafler V Cooper, in March of 2012, following the filing of my initial habeas application. An application for writ of Habeas Corpus was filed challenging this error that occurred in this case but was dismissed, because it was not presented in the : initial application. recently in Chaidez V United States, was decided by this court inwhich it was stated that this tafler V. Cooper; did apply retroactive because it was simply a garden-varity of Strickland V Washington, which now brings the following question; Whether or not the Court decision was-cantrary to a decision by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, also by this court court court on the review of a rule the did not exist at the time of an initial application ? Also was the court's decision contrary to clearly extablished law. I wr &y ,