No. 20-5429
Derrick T. Neville, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court can consistently apply the Sixth Amendment and the Court's holdings in Apprendi and Alleyne to require a jury to find facts that increase a criminal sentence beyond the statutory maximum or mandatory minimum
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ST In Shotar 44s court Wold dat line ce bespyicu A Sedevel shivie.” Nos fwithStoudiny the forementionnd, Can a img Covet Consistent with the Sivin Mmendwewtk aud eS COPS Teldinge. te Apprendi onal Hligawe ‘cae a eck is courks holdinas in Apprendi awed Allurene ose a Cu, 6b hor Sng the {. + of a orior a: werk ie” be Sito reef a . wee ee we ee eee eee ee ee a ee wo we eee | :
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent