Whether reasonable jurists could debate the limitation on cross-examination of prosecutor about peremptory strikes in Batson claim

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether reasonable jurists could debate that the District Court's limitation on the crossexamination of the prosecutor about objections to the use of his peremptory strikes in other cases with respect to the Batson claim was a defect in the integrity of the federal habeas corpus proceedings? 2. Whether reasonable jurists could debate that Petitioner's Motion for Relief From , Judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), was a "true Rule 60(b) motion" and filed in a reasonable time? 3. Whether Petitioner was entitled to the appointment of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. : Section 3006A, under the specific circumstances of this case?