When Petitioning for Federal Habeas Relief, is the Actual Innocence Requirement Satisfied Where Conceding Guilt Nevertheless Could Not Have Legally Authorized Prosecution in the First Place Anyway?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When Petitioning for Federal Habeas Relief a 2 Time, 1s the Actual Innocence Requirement Satisfied Where “ Conceding Guilt “” Nevertheless Could Not Have Legally Authorized Prosecuhon in the First Place Anyway ? If a Court Adjudicates “Imagined Claims Never Rased— Dismissing the Pehtion, : ‘Thus, the Real Clams, Thereby — Can “This Fact be Pleaded to Authorize a 274 Federal Habeas Petron “Without ” a Show of Actual Innocence 2 New Evidence 7 How Do We Know rf a Court “ Considered the Ends of Justice ” as Required by Supreme Court Precedent [When Dismissing Successive Habeas Claims] If the Court Never Mentioned 1+ in any Order ? ’ Do Prisoners Have the Right to Disobey Orders “That They. Perceive as Unlawful — or Must a Prisoner Bow Down to Every Order a Guard" Issues Right Away z Just Challenge the Lawfulness of 1+ Loter (im Court ) f so_Inclined ? Have North Carolina ¢ the 4 Cireurt Given Church-State-Rule its. First American Sanctuary _ Through This Case — In Violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause ? (ii) |