Whether a specified § 333.7 C1 stage-1, Cig bl Le Review' initial hearing' can be considered a actual product for a mandated judicial individualized Parole Consideration hearing

No question identified. : | Russtionss PEESEMTEO Fab, Whelhes a specibied § 333.7 C1 stage -l, Cig bl Le Review» nndial hearing’ fan be. Consider a actuall product fa Mandaled lecdial lodividualzed. Parole Cons'dersd ons hearin 7 OR Nusha All Review thal dedermines whether Lhe perio. wil be. considered. ab a.subsapuenb Favole Coméslerslow hearing, va? vob Sew do be 2 vexing Sentencing sie, bukit allecle Uhousands of Gre 1047 Sevdenced Mendes who hove been System abicaly dud ahitraly drpittad of a mondilad juiliil tadviduahzed Parole heavy, beseechs the Sulewent SLi coud Lo proled out lorbbiluleowil Reghts, . Seconds Can the stile owil ars enbre. calegory of porsehnardd. wrandibed . by slibile, — dati, thee change. Lhe Pumdanueut for Lhe apphcalions Loa. disadvrvlageous elahily requvesserl, vecommendalivas Cor parole helore. the appl steve ol Lhe rhulaheans ot Parole Cons dembon dales, foe prestaa7 Senbenred ollenders. Ana, Whelhes the wew crime viliwe [anes Two Sema parole proces. "give. greadny discretion lo the Board Lo defer ars tnubial Prcale Consicloraliors heaving rd ushelher Lhe change to : Frequency ne) escholuhig aw Mender and whether Lhe spslow adualy fprondes Hw? ofporlus-tly bebureen deéeral periods, Saud whether Lhe change yn factors Lo he tonsidetad i deciding tuhelher ans Mendes (6 relesed ovr pare, Saud whelher Lhe calrubslrors of pace. Considerabions dales by the Bead 1 aeall ex posk Lilo vrolrteons to Fre-1997 Leen to Ife of Fenders whose crimes were tommilled bore. Lhe enadbrrad. of THe ru sibs ldots Motes Foudh , by @ wing Aus enlire calegony of fntshecel sporthesly designed anid Mancdibed. by élite, fra spelid. chiss of ollendws, cain Lhe 4lile boby Semanny deprive. | , prlbouer prbbearser And ll imbiy Silurbed fre !997 Lem to Me olben de the apphisbo. of eamed tredls rth AP ree (freeess. , Ewe, is tk fs shable Lo he DEewWD ACLESS To THE /ourTs, 7-a7-20 . Page-2 PARTIES Peks browser 15 ans tawate al Lhe LAWTons CoRRECTIDOAL acd REMMBLLITATI DAS FAcUTY, to LAWTOR: OKLA GOT S.£ FLOWER MOULD ROAD LAwTios OKIA 13501 Respondent » . ; , IS RC. Smite, wiatden ol THE LOWTIOnS CORRECTIONAL Ad ReMMBITAT IO‘ . FACWITY » LAWTDas bila, oO $L07 9.£. Fldus€® Wouud Redd. Lawton OK 1350! TABLE OF ConmusTtEniT Queshous Presented. o 2 2 6 Pages : PARNES bsvolved o o o! 2 Page THBLE OF ConstéeasT 2 ° o oe Pages Ythrough b TABLE oF AutoRITIES e e 2 2 Pages ‘7Lhrough Y CiRLuit 2ASES CITED Co 6 o 2 Pages 4 Lhrough v7) Détismieos Beloa o o 2 e Page / ConSTiTUTIOWAL Arid , | STATUTORY Proeuisioms 2 a oe ° Pige 420 DURIBDICT IO‘ : 2 ° o o Page 13 ComBiinedD STATFUET OF CASE , AND RFNS00S FOR GRaoTIOd WRIT oa o o a Pages 14 Lhrwugh 2) Fival Araunaeud 2 P2TITINER HAS Bien , DEPRIVED DE Any INITINL PAROLE ConsiDFAATioes . HewRiud, AvDd EvER Since OF A PAROLE. CODALDFRAT IO‘ HEBRIOG b Db > 6 Pages 22 Yeowg 427 Sétowm AraumenS Perimeter WAS BEF DePhivel) OF HIS INTFREST OF THE SuPeRSEDZNS . Act . 37 8232.7,.01497) FoR TH calcuLerions OF PAROLE ChnosiDFRATIDLo DATES, 2 > o 64 Page LS Lhaough Bal . Page 4 THIRD Araumeuk $ THE CRime ViCTIWwAs Law Two arade PRRoLé PRocess 15 A . €X Post FACTO VIOLATLOAS o PS 2 Page 23 id 26 Fourth Araumenl. 8 PetITiDIOe? WAS Bess DePRiveD Of THE APPLICATIONS OF CREDITS . e 2 oO Pages SILbtough YS Figth Avaumeak S Petirwwet V5 Beew . DENIED ACCESS ~to THE COURTS 2 .6 ° 2 Peges Yb Lough 49 APPEMDIXS —A~ 9 SUPPLEWZWTAL RZPORT AnoD REAOWWAENDATIONs = EKH/B/T A-/ Lhrowah AE WESTIE Rn DISTRICT OF OKLYNNWA —™ ORDER = ExAIBIT™ A-10 through A-do waste a@ns DISTRICT OF OIANOW =~ SuDAmenr exHBiT A-Ye Adbendix ~ BR ~— . ) : UsiTeD SURES CouRT OF APPEALS FOR THE TET CIRCUIT ORDER DENA LERTIEICATE OF APPFALABILIT? EXHIBIT B-/ Lhrowch BS AfPEODIX ~ L~ PHILLIPS UW WiLL MAS ; ; FOR Gotten Man ACT EXHIB IT™ 4.+/ throw C-7 . PAs a APPsropixe ~+ D~ PETITIONERS COnvSolLI DATED REroRD CARD Ex BIT D-/ Lrough D-i/ PETITIOOFRSE “SUDAWE ST AIDD SETEASCOA EXAIBIT™ D-12. Lhtough D-Ib APPfobixe ~E~ : THE OKLAHOMA STATE COURTS mETUO