Should this court end the conflict in lower courts by applying Schein rules nationwide that Arbitration Award is effective upon its perfection under notary witness sworn affidavit, non-judicially where the issue of the Arbitration Award as an operation of law is the pre-cursor to the secondary questions thus disapproving lower courts' interpretation of non-judicial Arbitration Award specially when those interpretation was done by a very corrupt recalled judge which has significantly damaged Petitioner economically, physically and emotionally and continues to damage Petitioner economically, physically and emotionally?

QUESTION PRESENTED A recalled judge in 2018, Mr. Aaron Persky of Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, granted relief in 2012 to strangers to an alleged financial transactions, while blocking any and all Petitioner's attempts, of discovery. AGETHE attorneys at Severson & Werson APC admitted, later on, that they ‘ ever ever had ot have any power of attorney to represent neither U.S. ° BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GREENPOINT MORTGAGE TRUST MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AR2 ("the ghost") which never existed and does not exist nor U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION nor from any damaged party, party of interest and holder in due course of the alleged debt, alleged note [which is forged] and alleged mortgage. The facts are that, all cases, including traffic, civil, criminal, civil harassment et. al., filed in courts are assigned Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures ("CUSIP") numbers which are traded on 7 . ipvall Street and monetized through variety of ruses, to wit: through Credit | ; RN SDefault Swaps ("CDSs"), Collateralized Debt Obligation ("CDO"), Yield ii r Spread Premiums, all other insurance payouts, leveraging on deprivation of people's rights under the color of law (packaged as CUSIP numbers), in violation of 18 US Code Sections 241 and 249 as well as Title 42 US Code . sections 1983 and 1985, among others. In majority, if not all these cases, the sources of the monies used for . these CUSIP numbers' trades, are from sex and human trafficking, child trafficking, drug cartels and unlawful conduct. The court administrators erroneously labeled as judges, such as but not limited to the recalled judge, Mr. Persky, systematically denied and deny any and all discoveries as to proof of the value allegedly paid for these . fabricated and false transactions by the identified entities since: 1) they know, those sources identified, are not the sources who paid anything for the alleged financial transactions identified in the manufactured paper trail filed in courts and in county recorder; 2) they are bribed to disallow discovery. From time to time, some court administrators, based on ignorance, or simply because, they can not be bought, or both, allow for discovery, and all of sudden, the homeowner would be offered a confidential settlement offer by the ghost's culprits, yet the criminal enterprise continues its operations as usual, on other victims. The review by this court of records is a matter of National Security. iii it Moreover, the court of Appeal in Sepehry-Fard expressly set aside 4 perfection of Petitioner's Arbitration Award, as if it did not exist, creating an. irreconcilable conflict in the published SCOTUS decision in Henry Schein, Inc., et al. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit No. 17-1272. Argued October 29, 2018— Decided January 8, 2019. The issue presented is: . Should this court end the conflict in lower courts by applying Schein rules nationwide that Arbitration Award is effective upon its perfection under notary witness sworn affidavit, non-judicially where the issue of the Arbitration Award as an operation of law is the pre-cursor.to the secondary questions thus disapproving lower courts' interpretation of non-judicial Arbitration Award specially when those interpretation was done by a very corrupt recalled judge which has significantly damaged Petitioner economically, physically and emotionally and continues to damage Petitioner economically, physically and emotionally? iv