Lorenzo Robertson v. Ozell Pace, et al.
Why have My Care not been Yaking, Serioas 2
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I, Why have My Care not been Yaking, Serioas 2 A, Why hove Nongof the Coors) taking ite sideration this the Chisinick Covrt) stated 10 Necoment . 46) Anex any @rrevance, remMecls es) shov\ Ay. e, ( 0 Cex hausted), ecase RIC placed Sherr Lam penroy aC Fig’ nal) gnevance, Which Sen Cg-\\S),& the ()isheicd mh 4 * Jalsostwted nat When KDC placed that Ghamaen aranted an * CEnded) the ProcedureSo why was ADC Sommacy ot To} MY Orie Vance rene, gment)en me Nor exhausting sent my. Csecona) on 51 What the courts don't uncderstatrd 3g Cacho? WMevANce on Me berng Er rkbed) was me. Ne of the ‘edgimenrt>) 0 $ the issve, 2 the rows RE Wer Coor’) hecause Sle dec)! Third gmeyance was en My are jnr she oVner of ey ‘ ane dra nt take. ry berng Ghabbed)) 4 LEE wee femedres, panes Should'nt Count as mene) Wasi 4 tak val) conten r alost oo My Crginal) oe; ; te Skhow sting % Whey ON $erto0S, becasge th ns ING Stabbed) . YANCe on G.-yIF) Show) Pea Cleaned a Donde NE, CLegal heieee Heres: an When you 4 Amend 1OYy Not Can gek Nee coors eS en os Wark carbon why are Mrartdeg : u Why Ss the Sive me, Biscover ty INESY gerbe} us 4 op lad) of the. HO Present mien ease $ NM Courts be; , ™ Case Hels n. 4 Gar) 3. Why d 3. Qnesided) : , whi ©es(my \ fe, Not tat , Uneler the Cons: 4 \ eC Me The Coort system CE | Won we're sugpase Lo be me? CEyia\ othe cyees nella)