Whether the District Court abused its discretion by allowing the Petitioner's Motion/Response to be stricken and denying the Petitioner's request for a 2-day extension of the stay of execution

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) The quizennents Flap A Res possi tp te Del ioWen's a. bass” Duns Arta O€0CRe0 by tle Pwet', the Guctnmed 9 Adeatts | Comes flat "4 Folge", Dio the Distard Cott Abose Zs DISC C4 fons by Allo dine tte bese Rurted ‘s Mohow/Resprsé te be Belen Gol id Daryl jte Péetbasens 7 22S, hel + QvceveEs tat it hao " Bo bgot 4 (sce Aah) myo Banks Imo opprsee He Reset 2) ThE Serle ci my [ommrss ton azssueg A Nolan Fy & teheoactus Amewomet" iw Legare To tte Midoe} mitigat (4g Role 2Zouctiod Lo Oklo@ Te Bawls Strlevcme\. pil pacties Cxcepe +tnt Ma. Bavk's plyeo A, MWe | Gale, Police, He Cows Fruleo To (is Te Reovest Pur He 2-4 tel eeoution At SLoleveols, as fle Cwwsel ZyeFiactwe + 1F 2, OP He 7 . Diotnid louet Et I Fel Te bud +4 | , Evie Any Haig of Rescit te Clg 7