No. 20-5472
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-authority criminal-procedure due-process federal-law jurisdictional-challenge restitution sentencing state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court had legal and constitutional authority to impose restitution, in light of the clause in 18 U.S.C. 3231, and Mo. Rev. Stat. 544.170
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Question (s) PRESENTED : THe Skate of Missenri hos & Statute thot โ tmminolizes tne transkie oP dee. Custadd or โ @acontcol of ONY Corin +o aNatrer, or ko another place, when the statole is Votated bu Law antoceanreat Prior to Saicial wvelvement. The Eagnthy Circart hos Aeocred O Uelahon of Mo. bev. Stat, 4.170, & unconahtohona.| Procedure... (abhor aASke This Court ยป vonetngr She district court had Lacal and constituhonal avinordy to inven peistremon, iA Lignt of The Clouse in 18 USC. 323t, and Mo. Aa, Stat 544,110 : i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent