No. 20-5474
Montez L. Clayton v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's sentence was unconstitutionally excessive
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : : no de auestion.) PRESENTED . A Why wee \ sentenced xo wo wrote hen my CTW nal Mekory a 1S nok Se bh an ANG ig The Fick Hime.) @ver been Fo Reison@ & Whe Jadge said Weappresioke me Yelling Ye edn Crom dhe Woe ginny anh adeniti Querying abode dre Pobberies ano} me bei honed \ a Soe tne. youd ioe Prise bor then THN acond ach « he bigs enc o& Yre, senkence dad qo WAY OVET MY QUIET ines 5 Why Cider ower” oye Yo ope iny whe prosecd Lot Savor og adsedjodge ve do wh Was MY Cou nse inekkechive 2 Se De | / ,
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent