No. 20-548

Jessie Eugene Shelton v. Robert C. Tanner, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment due-process improper-jurisdiction ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-filing prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a pro se filing by petitioner in 2012 to the District Court, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and an invalid plea would deny a second filing by the petitioner, by counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a pro se filing by petitioner in 2012 to the District Court, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and an invalid plea would deny a second filing by the petitioner, by counsel; Alleging prosecutorial mis-conduct in the allotment procedure, filing the matter in the improper jurisdiction and wonton ineffective assistance of counsel and denial of a full hearing on these allegations in the 22>4 District Court, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. In contradiction of due process under the 5t® and 6th Amendments applicable to the States under the “Due Process” clause of the 13 and 14th Amendments. i

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Tanner to respond filed.
2020-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2020)

Attorneys

Jessie Shelton
Robert J Stamps — Petitioner
Robert J Stamps — Petitioner
Robert Tanner
Matthew CaplanDistrict Attorney, 22nd Judicial, State of Louisiana, Respondent
Matthew CaplanDistrict Attorney, 22nd Judicial, State of Louisiana, Respondent