Marvin Arido Sorro v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
Arbitration Securities
Did the United States District Court deprived the petitioner access to the courts and to state a claim?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Did the United States District Court Deprived The Pelitioner Access To The Courts and to State a Claten When tt Departed From the Accepted and Usual Course of Sudrcial Proceedings And in Woy Thot's Conflict With . Federal Law Questions. 2. Did the United Slates District Court Deprived . The Petchoner of Wis Procedural and Substantive Due Process When B failed to Give Proper Notice And Conclusion, Facts and Law on the Merits Contrary To Federal Law, The Const futon and , Previous Rulings By This Court. 3. Arizona 18s Without Ruthocity to Excercise Lis Jurisdiction over \ne Pebhioner Because Arizona, ts Prohibited From Youing Slaves Wheh Shall be Settled By This Court, Y. The Unlawls! Commitiment to \ncarceration of The Petitioner wos in Violation of The fourth Amendment's Due Process Clause. And the Koplicant was Prosecuted Without Probatle Cause, Vio lating Aciz. Const, Acti, Section 30, . 5.(“Lilhen an individual is... deprived oF Wiis FREEDOM bY The Authorities IN ANY SigniTiCAN . WAY ANd 15 SubTecled To Questioning; me . privilege AaAnst SeLF-INCR\ MINATION 19 . Teopariize ‘)