Whether the procedural bar of res judicata may serve as the basis for the dismissal of constitutional claims that were previously raised, but with substantially different underlying reasonings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Whether the procedural bar of res judicata may serve a5 The basis For the dismissal of constitutional claims that were previously raised, byt with substantially . different underlying reasonings. Whether case low authorities may be applied to any constitutionol claims thot were not subject oF those decisions, Whether the (5120/35 years to life Firearm enhancement . provisions render T\l\inois’ Mtemp+ statute unconstitutional on its Face under the Crue) and Unvsval Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment, Whether the Illinois Supreme Court's decision Sharpe overruling the Lllinois Supreme Court’s constitutional decision in Morgan was badly redsoned and wrongly decided, and therefore must be overruled, Whether petitioner's 45-year Firearm enhancement is | unconstitutional as applied +o him under the due Process Clause of the FiF th Amendment, ( -\ 8 AISTOF PARTIES J. All parties appear in the caption of the case ‘on the cover page. oe ae [ ] All parties do not appear in the. caption of the case on the cover page. A list.of a oo all parties to.the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this ‘ ; -petition.is as follows: ©. ae a ons We es res TABLE OF AUTROMTIES C\TED OS Davis v. Passman, 444.0.5,288 C919) 2. . Groham v. Florida, 560'V.5.48 (A010) 2... ee 18 : Marbury v. Madison, 5 0.5.4 Cranch 8701803) . 2. 2. eB . McCulloch v. Maryland, 17.5.4 Wheat. NGC) 2. aT Miller vy, Alabama, SGT V.S.4GOQOD . 2.22... le Co Moskal v. United States, 499.V.5.\0301110) . 2... 30 | Payne v. Tennessee, 501.5. 80809 2 rl United States v, Powel, NI3\5.87 0975) 2 80 People v. Harris, 206 IN. ad 16003) . Dee ee ee ee DO 7 People v. Bloomingburg, 346 IN. App. 34 308004) NG People v. English, 353 I. App.3d 337 GOO Ll 2. Nile | People v. Thompson, A013 \L App (let) W305 Lees \G Oo People. Hole, Adlai AppCHHh OMA ee, ee | People v. Horta, A0\G IL AppCad) MOTH. seo we ew we IA | . People v. Morgan, 203 IN. ad 470003) 2. 2 ee ee AOD . People v. Guyton, 20\4 WL App (st NONS0 2. we ee | Peoplev. JeFFries, AGH Ad ONOMS) 2 ee ee es a8 . People ¥, Sharpe, ANG Til. dd 481 (A005) 2. Oe | People v, GraF ton, 20\7 WLApp (ist) Wa5G6-U SL. ee 85 | | People v, Boker, 341 IN, App. 34 1085 (2003) 2. 2. 2. 88,35 People v. Aliwoli, 436 Ul.Mpp.3d GOA C9)... ee -Hian | STATUTES AND RULES : | . WS. Const, Amend, Vi... ee ee ee eee ee AY \.5. Const. Amend. VID ee 8 Ti. Const. VA7O, APR TSN 2 ee FAOILCS 5ID-3.6 ee 2 33 TA0 \LCS SlA-M5,5 2 ee ee 9334 . . FAO 1LCS SEB ee ee ee 19,34, 97, 30,33,33 TROVLCS DIB4,F-) Ne ee OY ; JAOILES SIVA ee ee 2 20 TROILCS SIAL ee 30,31 TR0ILCS S/S-G-l ee ee ee 0,84 | TROVLCS SIS“4.5-35 2 ee ee ee AY TROILCS SIS“N5S-30 2 ee WO FBOILES S/5-5-3. 2 ee eG . FBOILCS SIS-B-L ee ee ee ON, PSILCS SHAW ee ee ee AB | -iv