Is a standard condition of supervised release too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Is a standard condition of supervised release which requires a person to “permit a probation officer to visit [him] at any time at home or elsewhere” too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition “involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to further the statutory purposes of supervised release? ii PARTIES Petitioner: William James Payton Respondent: United States of America