No. 20-5496

Santosh Ram v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 actual-innocence constitutional-claim constitutional-violations evidentiary-standard judicial-review lower-court-analysis mcquiggin-v-perkins post-conviction-relief procedural-due-process schup-v-delo
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether evidence of actual innocence provides a legal reason to reopen 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion proceedings to establish constitutional violations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Whedthey evidencecs> ch an actual innocence Provides a Jegal reason to fecpen 29 Usc4 2255 Motion Proceedings jo establish Const dutioal Violette in Sight of cases Such a Schhp uv. Delo 553 US. 29g 945), Me Quigain Ve Perkins, 569 US. 283 (2053): Lower Court Jailed do cike any dejad authevit4 and failed to explain why evidencecs) did nab provide a deg of “ “oy Weason ? w fav justice syskm shall alway ¢ pus l host 4 ‘ | Pa rere oss OM MNO CehCe y wed when if filed te engage 2. wWhedher dower Cows ple anoltis vequived by dhe vn dhe «Camprvehensive, <q . ” ‘ fated sh aa Fedral Rule of Ciik Procedure 6oG),Stegall Cove degal Slandavd , and applied in Corre Jd . Mokens 2 it

Docket Entries

2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)

Attorneys

Santosh Ram
Santosh Ram — Petitioner
Santosh Ram — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent