Marcus Simpson v. Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, et al.
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether perjury has amounted to and causes one or both the judicial usurpation of power or abuse of discretion by the trial court, therefore mandamus (Lie's)
No question identified. : Preface: An alleged victim commits perjury initiating aggravated robbery criminal proceeding’s in the states courts against a innocent person. That causes the innocent person to be arrested for then indicted on the aggravated robbery charge, put thru hearings, then trial by the court found guilty of the charged offense and ordered incarcerated pursuant to the trial courts judgment. Thereafter, the now convicted (but innocent ), person attacks the judgment collaterally attempting to vacate it, setting forth the illegally withheld and omitted evidence that proves there actual ~ innocence, and proves the illegal use of perjury by-way of the alleged victim own recantation conceding in open court the aggravated robbery was not committed or even attempted. But the State’s Courts refuses to adjudicate the merits. QUESTION’S PRESENTED Whether perjury has amounted to and causes one or both. The judicial usurpation of power or abuse of discretion by the trial court, therefore mandamus (Lie’s). ; i LIST OF PARITES [X] All parties do net appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all