No. 20-5499
Savannah Rolle v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process essential-elements guilty-plea plea-bargaining rehaif-precedent rehaif-v-united-states vacatur
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's guilty plea entered before Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2020), in which the defendant was not advised of the essential elements of the crime with which he was charged, constitutes a due process violation requiring vacatur of the guilty plea
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a defendant’s guilty plea entered before Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2020), in which the defendant was not advised of the essential elements of the crime with which he was charged, constitutes a due process violation requiring vacatur of the guilty plea. i
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Rescheduled.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-30
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 30, 2020.
2020-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 26, 2020 to October 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 26, 2020.
2020-09-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 25, 2020 to October 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)
Attorneys
Savannah Rolle
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent