No. 20-5500

Valentin Spataru v. Pedro Antonio Suarez, et al.

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-08-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-ethics pro-se-litigation procedural-rules professional-responsibility standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Florida judges may disregard my filings and prior cases, and may not exercise the standard of care requested by law and expected from professionals in the USA and State of Florida pursuant to Rule 7.110.(e) of the Florida Small Claims Rules

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. Whether Florida judges may disregard my filings and prior cases, and may not exercise the standard of care requested by law and expected from professionals in the USA and State of Florida pursuant to Rule 7.110.(e) of the Florida Small Claims Rules. 2. Whether “Lex iniusta non est lex” and judges have the authority and the obligation to refuse to enforce unjust rules, such as dismissal for my naming appeal other that “Notice of Appeal”. 3. Whether U.S. Const. Amend. [IX -which protects rights not enumerated in the . my right to benefit from the fairest, best and newest practices in judiciary procedures. 4. Whether Florida legislators at the state level have been lobbied and paid illegally by attorneys to complicate unreasonably and unjustly the rules of litigation procedure for a pro-se litigant with cognitive injuries to lose case. 5. Whether Florida judges may profiteer and discriminate against me, and allow the Respondents not to return my money and compensate me for the suffering they caused me. If you do not order Respondents to return my money and compensate me for the suffering they caused me, then they will defraud others. : These questions are of great national importance due to the high number of citizens who come to Florida.

Docket Entries

2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)

Attorneys

Valentin Spataru
Valentin Spataru — Petitioner
Valentin Spataru — Petitioner