Valentin Spataru v. Pedro Antonio Suarez, et al.
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess
Whether Florida judges may disregard my filings and prior cases, and may not exercise the standard of care requested by law and expected from professionals in the USA and State of Florida pursuant to Rule 7.110.(e) of the Florida Small Claims Rules
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. Whether Florida judges may disregard my filings and prior cases, and may not exercise the standard of care requested by law and expected from professionals in the USA and State of Florida pursuant to Rule 7.110.(e) of the Florida Small Claims Rules. 2. Whether “Lex iniusta non est lex” and judges have the authority and the obligation to refuse to enforce unjust rules, such as dismissal for my naming appeal other that “Notice of Appeal”. 3. Whether U.S. Const. Amend. [IX -which protects rights not enumerated in the . my right to benefit from the fairest, best and newest practices in judiciary procedures. 4. Whether Florida legislators at the state level have been lobbied and paid illegally by attorneys to complicate unreasonably and unjustly the rules of litigation procedure for a pro-se litigant with cognitive injuries to lose case. 5. Whether Florida judges may profiteer and discriminate against me, and allow the Respondents not to return my money and compensate me for the suffering they caused me. If you do not order Respondents to return my money and compensate me for the suffering they caused me, then they will defraud others. : These questions are of great national importance due to the high number of citizens who come to Florida.