No. 20-5502
Kareem K. Kirk, Sr. v. Janet Richardson, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation district-court-review due-process judicial-bias judicial-competence judicial-discretion judicial-duties motion-for-rehearing unelaborated-decision
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
MAINTAIN PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN IT, AND PERFORM JUDICIAL DUTIES WITHOUT BIAS, OR PREJUDICE
Question Presented (from Petition)
LIST OF ALL PARTIES ALL PARTIES APPEAR IN THE CAPTION ON THE COVER PAGE RELATED CASES KIRK VS RICHARDSON ET. AL, CASE NO, 12-2888 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, TAMPA FLA, JUDGEMENT ENTERED 12/22/2018 KIRK VS RICHARDSON ET, AL, CASE NO, 2D190089 SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS JUDGEMENT ENTERED 3/13/2020 KIRK VS RICHARDSON ET, AL, CASE NO; SC-20-407 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, JUDGEMENT ENTERED 3/23/2020
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)