No. 20-5504

Kevin L. Martin v. Cathleen Capron, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights court-discretion due-process equal-protection federal-pleading jurisdictional-review pleading-standards procedural-standards qualified-immunity standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-04-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the Petitioner's due process and equal protection claims were correctly dismissed by the district court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : . . a utstle > paeseate of C whethr< LhE Court oF avera[ of seve, fs coceurf Fetlew thé Lette< 26 the Jaw d <a | with Phe pred and raed) o puke Poeccss inal ged cart VITCaGEN Egua/ jorcticties poteck pectin fo Fhis CASE 7 (a) pistacct court Abds& ef Olsexcthés Ac Fuse p1erchn fe grle ld wn etlen Fre peeve + file An peoterdad coma larsdya this cASE ? List oF pects we all pocdes Appeaee 1" the eaptare oF thE cask Fhe covet fAge we All pacts de net Affe 1a) 4b€ eA tt4 of : HLE cAsE 27 thé cevex page list oF pectes fe th & preceeding 147 thE count whes€ Ue Lge at is fhE subject oF 4LE prtittes ps 45 Fellow. OO upthlen cA eee? Eta/ (2° Lf mchae) Cory G de Cabser sgh ehilliay cs) Je Baty a? J Hawill G1? sgt sprees ee aaleted cns£s . jee set (720 6145 ey LES at S72 (9 59 . jeg set 181Y ce ad 1767) able of centerd lean s Belews C ——— TT hesipdchea . eastitu era / D faye etl Sleas avelve fe neat oF the CASE é REA? Fer canting the ft LF —eseclaiteg YE oe = y, AE ck Auth xches » J. S Hey a A jeer ju 2. — da 4A © 28 o aafe £ bye Ng fta txXf. ~ Qe QO dul ) 2e2g 4 cutdt of 4 te / Fpetdhe -¢. war, Aa f Han. et Otter ge Zeal a ke sb the enables Vlei gar a 74 set £73 47 Le dad ve s77Creme z VV te fb e US G; o feo sef L9 §eaft shal M ign TS £3 S 76% Here 4 2ecl fe _TeAnpie bhet dau 4, <¢ Sef le7se ogy) JL . es SYM A afey 19 BY 34% iH (419 $4. WelFFE V mepenry, / Le Ys 53 S76 S77 1974. eat 3¢ Ad_I50 Yel us 395 Z . SAE SS oz oy 3] 3-4 see pl2 Han baba V madsen SUS 73 /&e3 z . . dines \f K cancz £4 US S04 L972 / AEE ge \P 5 136 LS Y3R £762.) -/ : 4 Ewen 9 fa a 7 Me (99g at SObght Md isle “2 E76 FE 34f $ 46a 63 7th, S8ee7) 2 Jy — Cle fen Mea lus Esl uce oF 7 SESe eatats fs LlY Fag 7H C4 2e(7 LRG DN / ves j q S7/ us [7% LEQ 194) ry —— a eee a STS ——statuhs aol cuks | fQ use 196 3p94 Ext cv cele nale 2 ard 33, 34, 20) plo mend cede 5 (43-[ tt seg rLE Brl ele 514-3] EL stg p ty ta1s-5)2)> p13 26 USE 64S.4. yi2 ZF us& JIS 6) B12 26 WISE 14/6 2) pl2 2E use 1S. of fel we app poe 4) 4) 6) plo rlale 145. © ple 2¥ USE jas? ay po) ; . 2e uscjas¢/oY | , Fed ener /87 pg os rel x efv 19-4 ely . | Suphene ceuet of the ante states . ‘ pelitier fea weit of ex-tlexeey petifienee Arapect Fully psy that A user , oF cet lena PS SUE fhe Aries thE dudg rent Lelew a pices. Belew FeA casts fac? pe deas/ ceuad,” THE eptalen ck fhE united sdates ob apree! Arpeae S ad aereads £ D aol J ad pha petttien and US . , ae acpeoted at tadeX, T6 Apperafckes see-Mew g has bre desigh ated Feat publeahes bef} os net yet Repeated eo’ ag is anpablished NP ga Fert cases Pet state court 1 “Th oplwerz = the highest date cout fe Crvltyy Sfhre wre tits Appeats at Arpeade& ) fe He petthes And £5 moetten fet disedrety si A a ferpeated Ab ral cA : eee eagnck | ee paerbes bebe nebek acpockd ok nk The ep lees oF the untted ebte ceutk ek Appel count Agyrtane at AppendK pant + the petrtier andts . ; i Arpeated AL anpealig -F 7 AR , ; a’ has bac fos rake d Fer publeatees bat (6 et Ye a He get f ect 1S unpebhshe | 74 TD Fer cases Fam fedea[ courts the oats 17 which FE united states ceurd oF Appel Jétided my CASE wt S we one pebbes pert Ktheaniag was finely piled vw my cack w/e pobhen Pea bebe uns teoaly File Lio og eA ' dn timely petite Fea peohereing wae daaied by fhe unite | stakes aL appeal en FE Fetfleering pate and 4e-ry oF tLE oe det fenyerg fprbeactay VEO ab appead % 7-448 qH An extenslea ok dine +£ pile 4hE pefites Fata Ase oF cantlehaal was grote fe ard pacladiag pat «7 aod pate (a I no A ae ote duaisdiche> oF fois peuxt tS inveked under 2% 48¢ 12sq-l-) qd fee easES Freer stort cour tl 7 ae eae ©? which the highest fete ecuck détidel my , case waS ery LE phat JeCrSleq APPEALS at Avpe-2d K an Exteasles oF dime oF ale the potter Fee awrt . oF eceb tant was granted + fhE taclading pate <7 ) ort ia) aap lecetten en #Lo A\ ThE Suaisdechor ch this covet 1s tarelCel vole , 2 usc [2 ST-4@ conde butions | and statetety | paces sens ravelved. CA) peo, SE cemplants Sach A

Docket Entries

2021-04-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2020-10-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-24
Waiver of right of respondents Cathleen Capron, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)

Attorneys

Cathleen Capron, et al.
Aaron Thomas CraftOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Kevin Martin
Kevin L. Martin — Petitioner