No. 20-5508

David P. Moran v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appellate-review constitutional-challenge due-process fourteenth-amendment motion-preservation preservation-of-issues statutory-interpretation trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is Fla. Stat. 924.051(1)(b) unconstitutional due to conflict with the due process clause of the 14th Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED . 1. Is Fla. Stat. 924.051(1)(b) unconstitutional on it's face due to it's conflict with ’ . the due process clause of the U.S. Const. 14th Amend.? oo 2. Should a motion not being ruled on by the trial judge be automatically preserved for appellate review with or without an objection being offered? | oo 8. Should a motion not being ruled on by the trial judge be automatically . preserved for appellate review when the issue the motion's contents of is material to trial? i

Docket Entries

2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)

Attorneys

David P. Moran
David P. Moran — Petitioner
David P. Moran — Petitioner
Florida
Wesley Heidt — Respondent
Wesley Heidt — Respondent