No. 20-5519
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: arrest arrest-initiation conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process prosecution prosecutorial-delay public-defender speedy-trial
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When does an arrest initiate prosecution for speedy trial purposes?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED APPELLATE DISTRICT COURTS IN ILLINOIS ARE SPLIT ON HOW AN ARREST INITIATES PROSECUTION OR WHETHER IT DOES ATALL. ARE THERE CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE A PERSON‘S ARREST AND ACCUSATION FOR AN OFFENSE, WITH DELAYS, CAN INITIATE HIS PROSECUTION FOR. PURPOSES OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TOA SPEEDY TRIAL. IN ILLINOIS, INDIGIGENT DEFENDANTS WHO ARE REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC DEFENDERS’ OFFICES’ ARE UNDER A DIFFERENT STANDARD REGARDING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AS THOSE REPRESENTED BY A PRIVATE LAW FIRM. ARE THERE ANY CONCEIVABLE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT COULD CREATE AN OFFICE-WIDE CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A PUBLIC DEFENDER‘S OFFICE. ILLINOIS SAYS NO. |
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2020-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2020)
Attorneys
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Richard Wanke
Richard E. Wanke — Petitioner