Whether the government's alleged unconstitutional conduct in denying the petitioner's constitutional rights to due process and equal protection was properly addressed by the lower courts

No question identified. : |l-l-b E CDT Bf qosund posmas si pL vaym aris Guraogua 30 3Ss1 WA WO Jwa\a S| ono) $09 saUReYN'L ‘SpULMED HL!you LOIsioap shpoq aA YUbnowuy wAosddyy pours, PaNataad JOU POY VUISWi9 Yons Ubroyy LANA LOS [o\AsUIUIEAOG G4 PWNS ING PALsiA WIM GUSLyeALda [OUSLMYLIsUAd s2ysUIYTO) '5 SaLGJo Sh~og pL hq payodoo hjj\a1y30 LaIsiaap JofUorpo\nGas BOVOU PIE Guewayys fared 0 paywawaldwi \wUolMy!4sUCIUN Bq >} pabajw SUM JOUF VOLO By BIIUM J9IP—I aalpounfds 3o Hyoyoso~ap hoa auew 394 Gyoas1p PMs 2q PMed salpog Guiusanah po00) JeMRyM'S . PsJybis UMUmMY [OU I}Pousa}u! JI $0 [9M Sv ‘su WY JOMOLMPL SUSI [YI9P2Z PU BLo4S ‘SAVOLI WoUUNY, 39 UO Hoo PAY POOMPN sty 3 gyteveld BAUdaP Jones JsayGIY) My pop 2H’ ‘PALSY PUY PANS som saiysad \jw 393 eSUNOD PLP sau JNIPING BW} Of paysoddnsun Si SUOISNYIUGD By} JaABUNC * SHUUNPUWW/ UOLID [LAY 0 UL Juawopnl’ 4 pnogap Joy UOYOW 9 Guihuap Ui passe AMO swasdns ame wUYMe! _ TSLNDS3SYd GINOUSINO