No. 20-5525

Larry R. Bailey v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-discretion discovery-rights due-process federal-lands fee-authority fees judicial-procedure public-lands public-records standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court erred when it determined that the Secretary of the Interior can charge an amenity fee

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (Due to cognitive issues from a previous stroke I am addressing questions in order that they appear in pleadings to limit confusion on my behalf) 1). Whether the District Court erred when it determined that the Secretary of the Interior can charge an amenity fee 2). Whether the District Court erred by lifting its order for planned meeting after both parties had met and fulfilled the order, and it was filed and, if it failed to follow the Appellate Court instructions. 3). Whether the agency wrongfully withheld public records, and agency council acted unethically by withholding evidence used during litigation. 4). Whether the District Court abused its discretion by denying discovery. 5). Whether my argument that the Forest Service must maintain the light regardless. of its fee designation should have been consider an amended complaint.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-25
Waiver of right of respondents United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Larry R. Bailey
Larry R. Bailey — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent