No. 20-5528
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: fourteenth-amendment jury-trial juvenile-adjudication prior-conviction sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments preclude a trial court from using a prior juvenile adjudication to increase a defendant's maximum sentence for a subsequent criminal conviction where the facts underlying the juvenile adjudication were not proved to a jury
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments preclude a trial court from using a prior juvenile adjudication to increase a defendant’s maximum sentence for a subsequent criminal conviction where the facts underlying the juvenile adjudication were not proved to a jury. 2
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2020-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2020)
Attorneys
California
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent
Miguel Romero
Michael Christopher Sampson — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Michael Christopher Sampson — Attorney at Law, Petitioner