Has the Government taken private property under the Fifth Amendment Clause of the U.S. Constitution for the benefit of the public without paying just compensation?

QUESTION PRESENTED If the Government: on the Executive level accepts a person’s intellectual property, passes it on to a government agency to be used with the public without paying just compensation; on the Legislative level accepts a person’s intellectual property, passes it on to a government agency to be used with the public without paying just compensation; on the Executive level breaches an implied-in-fact contract to pay just compensation for the use of a person’s intellectual property with the public without paying just compensation; on the Legislative level breaches an impliedin-fact contract to pay just compensation for the use of a person’s intellectual property with the public without paying just compensation; after inviting the intellectual property owner to several events (i.e. “SBIR Tour” in Colorado where several government agencies discussed and accepted the intellectual property; “TRUST” Industry Day in California where a government agency discussed and accepted the intellectual property; Oakridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Tennessee where a collaborative agreement was formed for use of the intellectual property; collaborative agreements was formed with Federally Funded Research Laboratories (i.e. Army ; Research Laboratory (ARL), Navy Research Laboratory (NRL)) for the use of the intellectual property with the public without paying just compensation; and, two trips to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) where the agency discussed and accepted the intellectual property, ‘ etc.) and used the intellectual property with the public in the form of soliciting request for information (RFI), request for proposals (RFP), grant applications, without paying just compensation; agency project managers and contracting officers for at least that of Department of Homeland Security breached implied-in-fact contracts to pay just compensation; government agency (DHS) not authorized to challenged intellectual property rights through a petition for iii Intra Partes Review (IPR) causes a “taking” of the intellectual property without paying just compensation; administrative court initiates a petition for Intra Partes Review (IPR) from an unauthorized governmental agency (DHS) that causes a “taking” of the intellectual property without paying just compensation; administrative court initiates a “frivolous” petition for Intra Partes Review (IPR) that violates statue and procedure (initiating the review with unauthorized . prior art that does not antedate the challenged patent and claims) causes a “taking” of the intellectual property without paying just compensation; frames all of the government “intentional” use with the public (described above) as government “incidental” use with the public of the intellectual property, causes a “taking” of the intellectual property without paying just compensation; “takes” the intellectual property in any or all the ways described in this question; has the Government “taken” private property under the Fifth Amendment Clause of the U.S. Constitution for the benefit of the public without paying just compensation?