No. 20-5537
Anderson Alexander v. United States
Tags: aggravated-assault armed-career-criminal-act civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process johnson-decision mississippi-state-law sentencing sentencing-enhancement united-states-v-johnson violent-felony
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Alexander should be resentenced without application of the armed career criminal provisions of the Armed Career Criminal Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW At issue is whether, under this Court’s law established in United States v. Johnson, Mr. Alexander should be resentenced without application of the armed career criminal provisions of the Armed Career Criminal Act. i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 30, 2020.
2020-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 30, 2020 to November 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 30, 2020.
2020-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 30, 2020 to October 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent