No. 20-5551

Ohio, ex rel. Jeremy Kerr v. Robert Pollex, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2020-09-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment constitutional-challenge criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-sufficiency jurisdiction state-court state-court-judgment subject-matter-jurisdiction sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a state court's judgment of conviction violate the 14th Amendment when the record is devoid of evidence proving the defendant committed an element of the charges within the state's borders?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does a state court's judgment of conviction violate the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution when the record of the case is wholly devoid of any evidence that could prove that the defendant committed an element of the charges within the borders of that state? Does a state court's judgment of conviction violate the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution when the record of the case is wholly devoid of sufficient evidence toprove that the defendant committed an element of the charges as defined by state law, within the borders of that state? In a challenge to a state court's subject matter jurisdiction, does a state court violate the 14th Amendment to the United State Constitution when it fails to demonstrate how it attained subject matter jurisdiction? 2 -2 a

Docket Entries

2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Pollex, et al. to respond filed.
2020-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 1, 2020)

Attorneys

Ohio, ex rel. Jeremy Kerr
Jeremy Kerr — Petitioner
Jeremy Kerr — Petitioner
Robert Pollex, et al.
David Thomas HaroldWood County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
David Thomas HaroldWood County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent