Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in dismissing Appellant Earl Clowbhaft's claims that the State of Ohio violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . AepeslS — Had Matter ouek f Strive Cortese . Deve lomentat Ser wees ) Gre. Ae tl ant E,ac/ Clowwbhaft filed 0”n July 6.2626 4 Jucrsdiat*a te Show cavse Chall ang sag Clams Ther Steve Violated APpe Hep (s) Elsp th Amend ot F Crou/e Ana Ya/vSa | Pow shment CT. Awd Pgyctecth Amend meat Mere : prefecth Dve process C lerm Sfe oF VS-S: 33/ Tat Covet lack< a pve Process $ a wy «Fhe Jurrsh dict tr gw MAY 28, we ; . Q2akb Afrz Haat Ear/ Cl even hact filed . . fr fiime /Y fe sfonce before July 30, 26290 Mea Clowuh art Kes Berle Ned 16 b« file d Res Pox ce he hore Tul¥ OF, QOZ6 Under time (€5F filers OF She bve OF limahkows Fe Qasd(y Casd” AP pellant Chowabact Wes bia ay . file? vadt& Stetve OF WMaet rons low ne united States cave? JF Afeals. p Missed Qve P10 cess vad@h The po le . . Fave tecath Antid Meat.