Whether the refusal of Georgia courts to provide a Georgia litigant any 'plain, speedy, and efficient' remedy to officers of the Georgia courts tampering with the court record in the litigant's cases, while also denying the litigant any declaration that the litigant is immune from criminal activity, imposes unusual hardship and deprives the litigant of protections guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments

Questions presented for review 1) Given that Art. I, Sec. II, Par. I, of the Constitution of Georgia of 1983 states. (a) "Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people and are at all times amenable to them," and OCGA § 9-2-3(b) states that "For every right there shall be a remedy...", does the refusal of Georgia courts to provide a Georgia litigant . any “plain, speedy, and efficient” remedy to officers of the Georgia courts . tampering with the court record in the litigant’s cases, while also denying the litigant any declaration that the litigant is immune from criminal activity, impose unusual hardship and deprive the litigant of protections guaranteed by ‘ the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution? 2) Whether the retaliatory pattern and practice of Georgia court officers removing and/or withholding documents from the court record of an active civil case, or tampering with documents in the court record of an active civil case, to deprive a litigant of the consideration of all relevant factors and subject a litigant to clear errors of judgment, amounts to inconsistent due process and deprives the litigant of protections guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution? . A list of all