Whether the Eleventh Circuit's decision affirming the district court's refusal to conduct a full resentencing with the defendant present renders the precedential Eleventh Circuit Brown opinion useless and limited

No question identified. : STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE(S) I. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S REFUSAL TO CONDUCT A FULL RESENTENCING WITH THE DEFENDANT PRESENT RENDERS THE PRECEDENTIAL ELEVENTH CIRCUIT BROWN OPINION USELESS AND LIMITED. Il. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S USE OF AN OVERLY HIGH BAR OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL RECUSAL STATUTE EFFECTIVELY EVISCERATED THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS OF A FAIR TRIAL IN A FAIR TRIBUNAL. 1 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE(S) OL WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S REFUSAL TO CONDUCT A FULL RESENTENCING WITH THE DEFENDANT PRESENT RENDERS THE PRECEDENTIAL ELEVENTH CIRCUIT BROWN OPINION USELESS AND LIMITED. ; I. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S USE OF AN OVERLY HIGH BAR OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL RECUSAL STATUTE EFFECTIVELY EVISCERATED THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS OF A FAIR TRIAL IN A FAIR TRIBUNAL. 1 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE(S) I. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S REFUSAL TO CONDUCT A FULL RESENTENCING WITH THE DEFENDANT PRESENT RENDERS THE PRECEDENTIAL ELEVENTH CIRCUIT BROWN OPINION USELESS AND LIMITED. , Tl, WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S USE OF AN OVERLY HIGH BAR OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL -RECUSAL STATUTE EFFECTIVELY EVISCERATED THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS OF A FAIR TRIAL IN A FAIR TRIBUNAL. |