Malik Timbers v. United States
I.
WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED
WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN FINDING THAT
TIMBERS' GUILTY PLEA WAS VOLUNTARY AND THE
SENTENCE-APPEAL WAIVER ENFORCEABLE.
II.
WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED
WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN DENYING
TIMBERS' OBJECTION TO THE ENHANCEMENT FOR
DANGEROUS WEAPON AND THE ENHANCEMENT FOR
THREAT OF USE OF VIOLENCE.
III.
WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED
WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN DENYING
TIMBERS' REQUEST FOR A MINOR ROLE REDUCTION.
IV.
WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED
WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN DENYING
TIMBERS' REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE.
V.
WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED
WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED TIMBERS'
SENTENCE WHERE TIMBERS' SENTENCE WAS
UNREASONABLE IN LIGHT OF THE STATUTORY
SENTENCING FACTORS LISTED IN 18 U.S.C. §3553(A)-(F) AND
PRINCIPLES APPLIED BY THE ADVISORY FEDERAL
SENTENCING GUIDELINES.
Whether the guilty plea was voluntary and the sentence-appeal waiver enforceable